data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eaf3/6eaf3f9db6eaa2bd22e7689fe00623162d86be01" alt=""
Growing up in California, I associated Spring with the beach, and maybe a replacement pair of shorts for ones worn all winter. In CA where things bloom year around, I took flowers very much for granted; not anymore, but I don't paint them if a broader view is available. This year, instead of avoiding what was everywhere I chose to paint a few blossoms.
At the top is a piece done here in Alamosa about a week before heading to Taos. The scene was a complex mix of 2 blooming trees, shadows and directional lighting. Obviously, I don't really strive for a realistic take on things but am looking for my own stylization of the subject matter. The lower painting is my version of a side lit lilac bush in Taos - with a more of a realistic spin.
In general, I am looking, striving, trying to find an abstraction that will communicate the essence of the view- but in my "voice". Every painter paints with a certain voice - some without even knowing, some intentional, some naive or untrained- and others actively trying to "sound" just like someone else. Pleasing and personal abstractions of landscape elements can be very elusive- like notes of music traveling on a breeze.
I am always looking for a way to communicate that looks like "me" or "sounds" like me;
the "voice" I want to put out there.
These pieces will never see the light of day, but serve as exercises for that purpose; and I only see myself in one of them.
It may not be my final answer, but it's a few more notes in a tune I am always wanting to catch.
2 comments:
Love the first, more abstract one. It's wonderfully painted and unexpected in its presence and presentation.
Thanks Patrick.
That one also appeals to me the most. Ironically,
I dismissed it in the field and conversely,
really liked the other one while I was doing it.
A good reason to never judge in the field.
Post a Comment